On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 16:22:01 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
was practical to run. Here's part of its output.
It looks as if
the very first instruction accesses a null pointer in a strange
way.
Actually scratch that, I don't know what I was thinking (not fully woken
up yet I suppose!). You're right, it's clearly expecting %eax to be set to
something on entry ... question is, what?