Chip,
Do we need to do something to deal with this or do you feel like I can
resend these patches?
Best,
Erich
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:40 PM Dean Greer <gcenx83(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Correct the official Winehq packages will be targeting 10.13 so for that it’s a moot
point.
The thing is if wine still “officially” supports down to 10.8 how to handle the missing
functions, I’d go with using a third party implementation that would then make needing a
newer SDK a moot point.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 4:36 PM Zebediah Figura (she/her) <zfigura(a)codeweavers.com>
wrote:
>
> On 8/30/21 2:54 PM, Dean Greer wrote:
> > We’d proposed that for the prebuilt packages as it’s PITA to build
> > libraries that are compatible with the lower versions of macosx, however
> > the library I mentioned to you prior already covers this and more missing
> > functions.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but compatibility libraries are a moot
> point if this function is available in 10.13 and we're requiring 10.13,
> right?