Dan Kegel wrote:
I think your approach is peachy, but Alexandre wanted
a version
check; look at his most recent post in this thread:
Alexandre wanted a version check when asked a different question. That
question
was when would we prefer an available native Richedit over the builtin one.
(i.e. in the LoadLibrary("riched20") case).
I think if we get a loadlibrary on an explicit private path, we should load
that dll natively, even if we have a builtin dll of the same name.
Cheers,
Jeremy